between the two disciplines. Best practices require CIOs
to consider the business implications associated with both
scenarios, rather than turn to what’s most comfortable.
“An IT decision maker responsible for disaster recovery
mustn’t automatically solve archiving-related problems
with backup solutions,” says Engel. “And an email database
administrator shouldn’t fixate on an archiving solution to
resolve a business continuity need.”
3. The retention and destruction of electronic records has
become a selective process. The majority of respondents are
selectively retaining electronic data for a specified period
of time. However, about 20 percent say they keep everything indefinitely, or selectively retain data indefinitely.
This may reflect a learned tendency to rely on nightly
backup as a retention policy. But that certainly doesn’t
make for a best practice in these highly regulated times.
Rather, enterprises need to implement archiving protocols
based on the business and legal implications of specific
types of data, and then communicate and enforce the
policy enterprise-wide.
4. Enterprises are actively investing in archiving technology.
In regard to infrastructure, enterprises seem to be on track,
with 62 percent already investing in information archival
technology. “Though in another survey conducted by IDG
last year, we learned that only 38 percent of enterprises
index their data,” Engel observes. Indexing is certainly a
best practice in eDiscovery, as the technology is used to
locate, analyze and present requested records in a timely
manner based on specific requirements.
Moving Storage to a Service
The greatest gap between best practices and best efforts
involves outsourcing. Storage-as-a-Service is becoming
a compelling option, in which information is selectively
removed from an operational system
and stored with a third party for
electronic archival and retrieval.
“It’s clear from the survey
results that IT leaders understand
the potential upside to outsourcing their storage requirements,”
says Engel. “So it’s no surprise that
Storage-as-a-Service is emerging
as an overarching best practice in
information management.”
That’s because it affords enterprises the capabilities necessary
to bring their efforts to the next
level. Storage-as-a-Service provides
data protection and recovery across
servers, shared files, even desktops.
Scheduled and automated archival
and backup are configurable based
on specific policy, and data meet
more stringent recovery time objectives and recovery point
objectives than in internal programs. What’s more, enterprises can leverage state-of-the-art technology without
the capital investment. The Storage-as-a-Service model
delivers the indexing capabilities required for eDiscovery.
Files are compressed to minimize the storage footprint,
and replications are made only for incremental changes
to existing files. And all of this is transparent to the end
user with onsite appliances for rapid restore.
Indeed, the return on investment for Storage-as-a-Service speaks volumes, with survey respondents pointing
to a host of risk and cost benefits. The risk benefits rate
highest overall, including simplified legal discovery, long-term protection and enhanced compliance; offloading risk
and third-party indemnification rank lower. Cost benefits,
including improved utilization, reduced complexity, simplified storage infrastructure and less floor space, rank
strong as well, but are secondary to risk rewards.
But only a mere 17 percent of respondents express readiness to jump aboard the Storage-as-a-Service bandwagon.
That brings to bear some critical questions: Is outsourcing
worth greater consideration? Are CIOs willing to admit
there could be a better way? And how confident are they,
really, in their strategies, now that the benefits of Storage-as-a-Service are understood?
“Most important with outsourcing, CIOs are free to
strategically analyze their backup and archiving needs
separately and implement the right information management for their unique business needs,” says Engel. “And,
of course, their valuable data assets are safe, available,
compliant-enabled and useful.” ▲
KARYN MURPHY IS A TECH FREELANCE WRITER BASED IN
MASSACHUSETTS.
[ MOST APPEALING ASPECTS OF STORAGE-AS-A-SERVICE MODEL ]
Transparent end-user access
Configurable policy engine
Unlimited capacity
Seamless file migration agent
Secured Iron Mountain facilities
65%
53%
48%
45%
45%
Billed monthly as a service
On-site appliance
Virtualization proxy
Other
None/Not applicable
23%
21%
21%
1%
3%